Newspaper: Breach of Promise. (DWYER/DILLON) *********************************************** Ireland Genealogy Projects Archives Limerick Index Copyright ************************************************ File contributed by: Mary Heaphy BREACH OF PROMISE - DWYER/DILLON Breach of Promise--At the Limerick assizes on Saturday, before Judge O'BRIEN, the case of Ellen DWYER and John DILLON was tried. The action was for breach of promise of marriage, and the damages were laid at 100/. The parties in the case were independent farmers living in the vicinity of Palla, of nearly an equal standing in society, and it appears that the defendant promised to marry the plaintiff before the 7th March 1859, that his father had a deed of settlement drawn up in which it was specified the lady was to have a fortune of 250/.; that the parties came into the town for the purpose of buying all the necessaries requisite for the wedding banquet, which cost £50, the money of the lady, and, notwithstanding which the defendant went the following day and married another. The young woman by this means had her name exposed, in compensation for which she sought the damages mentioned in the summons and plaint at the hands of the jury. The defence recorded on the files of the court was, that although the defendant had promised to marry the plaintiff within a reasonable time, it was upon special conditions, which were, that a person named John Dillon, whom he described in his evidence not as his own brother, but as the brother in law of the plaintiff, promised to give him a right to certain lands, but that the latter refusing to give it he was, therefore, to be discharged from the promise. In the evidence, however, there had been no proof of this condition, but is was proved that when the defendant's father was screwing for an additional fortune, his son, who had about £600 in value, replied he would sooner lose the difference, as he would not part with her for a thousand pounds, nor did he give any intimation of relinquishing her until the wedding dinner was purchased and he was married to another. The jury found for the plaintiff £100 damages, with 6d., costs. Source: JULY 25, 1859 COUNTY LIMERICK. FROM THE TIMES, COPIED FROM THE LIMERICK REPORTER