News: Compendium of Crime, Nenagh Guardian 1838-1839 Part 3

***********************************************
Ireland Genealogy Projects Archives
Tipperary Index
Copyright

************************************************

File contributed by: Mary Heaphy

COMPENDIUM OF CRIME, NENAGH GUARDIAN 1838-1839 PART 3

  A Compendium of Crime from the 21st July 1838 to the 13th. 
of March 1839, comprising a period of nearly 8 months. 
Continued.
  
  22nd. Wm. Brien, near Castle Otway,  was pursued by three 
fellows, and assaulted, from the effects of which he died 
the following morning, a man named Collins was apprehended. 
The jury returned a verdict of wilful murder.
  
  Michael Quin of Cashel, murdered by John Glasheen, with 
whom he had a dispute.
  
  Meade Nesbitt Esq. was wantonly attacked near Borrisokane, 
by men returning from a funeral, he was much beaten about 
the body, and had a deep cut on his head. The Police 
followed the party, and would have overtaken them, but for 
them being provided with horses by the Country People.
  
  25th Rody Moylan, a carman going with 12 other Carriers 
with corn to Limerick, being the last of the train, was 
pounced on by two men, knocked down with stones, and his 
head badly fractured. He has since died.
  
  Patrick Henbery, was murdered on the 15th inst by Michael 
Shea, who knocked him down, and for which the government has 
offered £50.
  
  Thomas Slattery's dwelling house on the lands of 
Loughernan, with in a few miles of this town, was 
maliciously burned to the ground. Two shots were fired into 
it previously. Slattery took a farm from which a previous 
tenant was evicted.
  
  A stone was thrown into the Methodist Preaching house, at 
Cloughjordan, which struck a board behind the Pulpit. Mr. 
Desmond's house in Nenagh, demolished for protecting a man 
from the vengeance of some combinators.
  
  Patrick Cleary, stabbed with a pitchfork by John Phelan, 
of Peterfield. A brass barrelled blunderbuss taken from the 
house of a man named M'Mahon of Bloomfield, (stewart to Mr. 
Scully) in the middle of the day-the man entered the house 
on pretence of lighting his pipe.
  
  William and John Caplis, waylaid on returning from a 
funeral by five men, John, Thomas, and Michael Blake, 
Kennedy and McKeogh. William's skull was fractured by a blow 
of a stone, his life is despaired of.
  
  A house belonging to John Going, Esq. of Newhill was 
maliciously burned.
  
  Michael O'Shaughnessy, of Templemore, was waylaid and 
assaulted by two ruffians.
  
  Inquest held on Quin, murdered in Cashel a short time 
since. Some witnesses were put out of the way and others 
would not identify. The prisones set at liberty.
  
  29th, A house belonging to Mr. Joseph Clarke, on the lands 
of Dromineer, was maliciously burned.
  
  The house of Thomas Ashbury, at Rodeen, was broken into, 
and robbed of two guns, a powder horn, and shot-bag.
  
  At the meeting of magistrates in Cashel, on Wed. the 25th 
Sept. the following observations on the subject of 
intimidation of jurors and statement of crime in Tipperary 
in 1836,1837, and 1838, was delivered by the Right Hon. The 
Earl of Glengall.
  
  "I say it is impossible to prove, by documents, that 12 
men, put into the jury box upon their oaths, are 
intimidated. How is it possible to tell what is acting in 
their minds?. But it is very easy for the persons hearing 
the trials, and then hearing the verdict, to form in their 
minds suppositions with regard to the feelings that actuated 
the jurors, or some of them, in their decision. I can lay 
before the meeting a document regarding homicide-for, as the 
Government only alluded to that crime. I have only directed 
my attention to it. As I said before nothing can be more 
difficult than to give proof of what is passing in the minds 
of the jurors. Many gentlemen here, perhaps, were at the 
trial of the men for the murder of the Widow Quirke, and 
recollect the conclusive evidence, nevertheless a verdict of 
acquittal was the result. J. Bourke for the murder of Bruton 
was also acquitted, and the learned Judge who presided asked 
the Clerk of the Crown, "Why, not guilty at all"? expressing 
astonishment that neither murder nor manslaughter was 
found-(hear)-and the public, I believe, were equally 
astonished-(Hear, hear,) -I shall, now gentlemen read for 
you the documents which I have obtained from the officers of 
the County. The first is a return of the number of persons 
committed for trial for murder and manslaughter in the 
County of Tipperary-number found guilty and acquitted for 
murder, number found guilty for manslaughter and acquitted 
for manslaughter-number discharged by proclamation, etc. in 
the years 1836, and 1837.
  
  Number of persons committed for trial to the two assizes 
for murder and manslaughter.
  1836-101 persons.
  1837-124 persons.
  Number of persons found guilty of murder.
  1836-5 persons.
  183710 persons.
  Number of persons acquitted for murder.
  1836-5 persons.
  1837-10 persons.
  Number of persons found guilty of manslaughter.
  1836-39 persons.
  1837-24 persons.
  Number of persons acquitted for manslaughter.
  1836-21 persons.
  1837-26 persons.
  Number of persons discharged by proclamation, bail, no 
bills found, or remanets for homicide charges.
  1836-45 persons.
  1837-53 persons.
  Total number convicted for murder and manslaughter.
  1836-44
  1837-34.
  Rewards offered by the Government for crimes generally 
committed.
  1836-46 persons.
  1837-29 persons.
  Number of these rewards claimed.
  1836-6 persons.
  1837-1 person.
  The cases given in the Government reply gives only the 
number of cases brought to trial, without stating the number 
of persons-in this return the number of persons is stated.
  
  Upon that I shall make no comment-whether or not justice 
has been obtained it is for the public to judge. By the 
Parliamentary documents it appears that, in 1836, forty-six 
rewards were offered for information respecting crimes, the 
numbers claimed were six-(hear, hear,). In 1837 twenty nine 
rewards were offered and only one was claimed. (Hear, hear). 
Now. Gentlemen, what description of crimes were those that 
rewards were offered for and not claimed, they are;-
  1836 Rewards
  Murder of Mary Quirke,
  Beating of James Daly, of which he died.
  Firing into Thomas Kearney's home.
  Firing at Landy and Lonergan.
  Firing at and wounding James Ryan.
  Murder of Jer Keogh.
  Murder of James Egan.
  Beating of Michael Quan, of which he died.
  Murder of Daniel Ryan.
  Murder of David Tobin.
  Murder of Wm. Reed.
  Firing at James Bourke.
  Firing shots into the Rev. Mr. Bagnell's house.
  Beating of Michael Brunnock, of which he died.
  Beating of R. Kenny, of which he died.
  Striking of Michael Connors, of which he died.
  Firing shots into the house of Rev. Wm. Lloyd.
  Homicide of R. Howard.
  Murder of James Scanlan.
  1837 Rewards.
  Murder of Pat Guilfoyle.
  Supposed murder of Thomas Ryan.
  Beating J. Harrington, of which he died.
  Beating Michael Cormick, of which he died.
  Beating Thos. Gleeson, of which he died.
  Beating of R. Brereton, of which he died.
  Beating James Walsh of which he died.
  Attempt to shoot Major. Lidwell.
  Homicide of Daniel Ryan.
  Murder of James Ryan.
  Murder of Private Gahagan, 13th regt.
  Firing at James Hetherton.
  Murder of Sub-Constable Shea.
  Murder of Denis Murphy.
  Murder of John Mannix.
  Murder of William Delany.
  
  These are some of the crimes for which Government rewards 
were offered, none of which have been claimed-consequently 
no one has been brought to justice for those dreadful and 
harrowing outrages. The results for 1838 are not yet made 
up, and consequently cannot yet be had from Parliament, but 
I have applied to the country books  and I find them 
agreeing with those in the Government reply, therefore they 
are correct. The noble Earl then read the following;- Return 
of the number of indictments for murder and manslaughter, 
the number of persons in those indictments, etc. for the 
year 1838.

  Murder.
  Indictments for murder-2.
  (The copy of the Nenagh Guardian is very bad, so can't read the next couple 
  of numbers.) M.
  Persons in the several indictments-?.
  Verdict of murder given-?.
  Verdict of not guilty-?.
  Guilty of manslaughter-7.
  Indicted for murder but found guilty of manslaughter-20.
  Indicted for murder and acquitted-2.
  Where the jury disagreed-2.
  Manslaughter.
  Number of indictments for manslaughter-25.
  Number of persons in the several indictments-57?.
  Number of indictments in which a verdict of guilty was 
brought in-14.
  Number of indictments in which the verdict of acquittal 
was brought in-12.
  Number of persons in those indictments found guilty-38.
  Number of persons acquitted-28?.
  The next return is still more searching;-
  Return of persons committed to gaol in the year 1838 for 
homicides, and the number convicted, acquitted, discharged 
by proclamation, etc.
  Committed to gaol-178.
  Convicted-58.
  Acquitted-46.
  Discharged by proclamation,-74,  bailed, and ramanets -178.
  
  Now, gentlemen, looking at the returns of indictments for 
murder and manslaughter in 1838, and finding that none of 
the parties indicted for murder were found guilty of murder, 
one of two things naturally strikes us-either the 
magistrates did not get the proper witnesses, or the jury 
did not choose to convict-one of the two must be the case, 
how otherwise will you account for the acquittals, for the 
persons must have been murdered?. (Hear, Hear). I leave it 
with those who are more conversant and habituated with the 
administration of justice than I am to say. I do not think 
it was an unnatural or unjustifiable conclusion for the 
magistrates to come to, that intimidation existed in this 
country, when such was the results of the assizes. (Hear, 
hear). That sympathy does exist is not astonishing. I have 
heard it frequently said that there are many persons, who 
when placed in a jury box, are reluctant to find a verdict 
of guilty, either from intimidation or sympathy, when they 
know that the sentence would be expiating. These documents 
are now public property, and I shall be making no further 
comments on them-I leave it to a discerning public to 
conclude whether the Government are justified or not in 
their reply respecting the intimidation of juries- (Hear, 
hear)-.How is it that such heavy outrages should have been 
committed and the rewards have not been claimed.? Assume 
that intimidation does not exist in  the jury box, it must 
then exist in the minds of the witnesses and prosecutors. If 
it did not exist in the minds of the witnesses, and 
prosecutors, why should there be such a difficulty in 
bringing the offenders to justice. (Hear, Hear.) Gentlemen, 
there are 713 outrages reported by the constabulary to 
Government in the year 1837. There is a difference between 
the manner in which the returns were made up in that year 
and in 1836. If they were made up similarly, that for the 
year 1837 would be double the number for 1836. That is 
explained by that very excellent and efficient officer, 
Colonel Shawe Kennedy, who, unfortunately for the Country, 
is no longer at the head of the Constabulary.